Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Feast’ functions as a charged symbolic and ritual site where the boundaries between nourishment, sacrifice, communion, transgression, and social order are continuously negotiated. The term appears not merely as a descriptor of collective eating but as a structural category through which archaic religious experience is decoded. Harrison reads the feast—particularly the ômophagia and the Feast of Tantalus—as ceremonies of sacramental communion rooted in totemistic mana-absorption, wherein a divine figure crystallizes out of collective ritual eating. Burkert extends this anthropological excavation, situating the funerary meal and the cannibal feast of Thyestes within a sacrificial logic that binds killing to communal integration. Nagy distinguishes rigorously between feasting with the gods and sacrifice to them, locating the Promethean feast at the very origin of the mortal-immortal division. Kerenyi perceives the feast as an enactment of myth rather than its appendage, an insight that carries genuine phenomenological weight. In the Homeric material, the suitors’ feasting in the Odyssey emerges as a crisis of redistributive reciprocity, a perversion of the sacred communal meal that demands violent restoration. Hillman, approaching from an archetypal-psychological angle, insists that eating in dreams—and by extension, feasting as symbol—carries underworld significance largely neglected by the psychoanalytic tradition. Across these voices, the feast marks a threshold between the human and the sacred, the living and the dead, order and its dissolution.