Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘fawn’ occupies two distinct registers that rarely converge but illuminate one another. In the contemporary trauma literature, most fully elaborated by Ingrid Clayton, fawning designates a fourth survival strategy alongside fight, flight, and freeze — an appeasement response that emerges under conditions of chronic relational threat, particularly in complex and developmental trauma. Pete Walker’s originating formulation, cited by Clayton, situates the fawn response as the adaptive comportment of children raised by narcissistic caregivers: the self is progressively evacuated in favor of the aggressor’s emotional economy. Clayton traces fawning’s phenomenology across hypervigilance, people-pleasing, financial and sexual self-abnegation, and trauma reenactment, demonstrating how the response becomes structurally embedded long after the original danger has passed. The second register is mythological and symbolic. In Harrison’s reading of Bacchic religion, the fawn-skin (nebris) worn by the maenad enacts totemic identification with the god; the fawn is the theriomorphic vehicle of Dionysian renewal. In Padel’s analysis of Homeric psychology, the fawn serves as an animal comparandum for Hector’s fearful retreat — tracking the emotional arc from coiled aggression through craven flight to final defiance. These two registers share a structural logic: the fawn-image names a state of vulnerability in the face of overwhelming force, whether that force is a hunter, a god, or an abusive parent.