The term ‘Eye’ traverses the depth-psychology corpus along several distinct but intersecting axes. In the Jungian and post-Jungian tradition, the eye functions above all as a symbol of knowing — the Eye of God, the eye of the Self, the fish’s eye (oculi piscium) of alchemical scintillae — each designating the uncanny experience of being seen and known from within by a transcendental subject. Edinger, von Franz, and Jung himself develop this theological-alchemical register extensively, tracing the eye as a prototype of the mandala and a vessel of inner light. The Hellenic tradition, represented by Padel and Snell, situates the eye at the intersection of physiology and metaphysics: Greek tragedy, medicine, and pre-Socratic philosophy conceive the eye as simultaneously expressive and invasive — a lantern projecting inner fire, a channel for emotional overflow, and a carrier of dangerous power (the evil eye). Abraham’s psychoanalytic contribution maps the eye onto the economy of scopophilia, castration anxiety, and genital symbolism. Jaynes introduces the eye’s social authority in hierarchical and bicameral contexts, while contemporary neuroscience and trauma therapy (Damasio, Shapiro, Ogden, Heller) treat it as a portal of subjectivity, a regulator of relational contact, and an instrument of therapeutic reprocessing. The corpus thus holds in productive tension the eye as numinous witness, as physiological organ, as erotic-aggressive vehicle, and as therapeutic tool.