The extrovert — rendered variously as ‘extravert’ in the Jungian tradition — occupies one of the two cardinal poles of psychological orientation in depth psychology, the other being the introvert. Jung’s foundational taxonomy in ‘Psychological Types’ (1921) establishes extraversion as the habitual direction of libido toward the external object: a constitutional readiness to engage, influence, and be shaped by the outer world. The corpus reveals not a simple valorisation but a nuanced, often dialectical treatment. Jung himself insists that both orientations are adaptive strategies rooted in biological necessity; neither is pathological in itself. Von Franz deepens this picture by examining what becomes of the extrovert’s inferior introversion — an inner life that, when accessed, can surprise by its purity and naïveté, yet when it erupts compulsively, produces a ‘barbaric’ withdrawal from the world. Sharp, Quenk, and Thomson each extend the clinical vocabulary, mapping the extrovert’s characteristic vulnerabilities: submersion in object-world, neglect of the subject, and the peculiar disorientation that depression brings when it forces an unwanted turn inward. Campbell invokes the contrast mythologically, aligning Gawain with the extrovert’s episodic, outward-moving quest. The persistent tension across the corpus is between extraversion as normal sociality and adaptive bridge to community on the one hand, and as a potential flight from inner reality on the other.