Within the depth-psychology corpus, exorcism occupies a liminal position between clinical psychology and the history of religions, functioning simultaneously as a cultural-historical datum, a diagnostic category in disguise, and an interpretive lens for understanding possession phenomena. Herman traces the concept’s genealogy through Charcot’s secular project of reinterpreting demonic possession, exorcism, and religious ecstasy as hysteria, thereby establishing the field’s founding tension between sacred and scientific explanatory frameworks. Jung and his school treat exorcism as the precursor to—and occasionally the functional equivalent of—psychological intervention in cases of autonomous complex possession, with Jung explicitly equating demonism with the displacement of ego-consciousness by psychic contents. Dodds and Rohde situate exorcism within Greek kathartic religion, connecting it to purification rites, pollution beliefs, and soul-conjuration practices that illuminate archaic psychic organization. Jaynes integrates the phenomenon into his bicameral hypothesis, reading exorcistic discourse as a response to the intrusive ‘voices’ of a disintegrating divine authority structure. Schoen extends the analysis into addiction studies, reporting first-hand encounters with exorcism as evidence for transpersonal evil, while the Daoist material in Kohn details exorcism as an institutionalized ritual technology within organized soteriological systems. Across all positions, exorcism marks the threshold where psychology, religion, and politics of the body converge.