Emerson

Within the depth-psychology and literary-psychological corpus, Emerson functions less as a biographical subject than as the foundational architect of the American Daemonic Sublime — the progenitor whose essays, journals, and lectures establish the axiomatic conditions under which subsequent American imagination operates. Harold Bloom, the dominant voice on this terrain, positions Emerson as the ur-source of American self-reliance, Orphic poetry, and daemonic consciousness: ‘Nietzsche is not the fountain of our will; Emerson is.’ Bloom traces how Emerson’s doctrine of obedience to one’s genius, his Hermetic Neoplatonism, and his ecstatic journal entries constitute the philosophical bedrock from which Whitman, Dickinson, Melville, Frost, Hart Crane, and Faulkner all derive. Jung’s seminar on Nietzsche independently confirms the archetypal vitality of Emerson’s ‘Circles,’ noting that Emerson’s use of the God-as-circle formula was not mere citation but a living archetypal fact. Edinger recruits Emerson’s poem ‘Uriel’ as an alchemical illustration of the dissolution of separatio into coniunctio. Across these voices, Emerson stands at the intersection of the daemon, the sublime, self-reliance as a quasi-religious principle, and the Orphic vocation of the poet — a thinker whose psychological reach extends well beyond transcendentalism into the deepest structures of American psychic life.

In the library

the use he made of it is not at all what St. Augustine would have made, which shows that it was a living archetypal fact in Emerson’s case.

Jung distinguishes Emerson’s use of the circle-as-God image from mere citation, declaring it an independent manifestation of a living archetype — validating Emerson’s thought through a depth-psychological lens.

Jung, C.G., Nietzsche’s Zarathustra: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1934-1939, 1988thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Emerson and, 25, 26, 103, 152, 153-54, 156-57, 159-60, 168, 169, 180, 215, 319, 321, 406 Emerson’s Wildness and, 15, 159, 165, 314 as ethos, 126, 218, 321

The index entry documents the systematic centrality of Emerson to the American Daemonic Sublime across virtually every major author Bloom treats, confirming his structural role in the entire argument.

Bloom, Harold, The Daemon Knows: Literary Greatness and the American Sublime, 2015supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

‘Self-Reliance’ (Emerson), 15, 29, 153-54, 169-70, 214-15 as the American Religion, 169, 174, 244, 232, 235, 236, 287, 319, 419, 496

Bloom’s index designates Emerson’s ‘Self-Reliance’ as nothing less than ‘the American Religion,’ showing how the essay functions as a quasi-sacred text underwriting literary and psychological selfhood throughout the canon.

Bloom, Harold, The Daemon Knows: Literary Greatness and the American Sublime, 2015supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Waldo’s daemon only infrequently composes. When it does, the accent is inescapable: The day of days, the great day of the feast of life, is that in which the inward eye opens to the Unity in things.

Bloom characterizes Emerson’s daemon as an intermittent but unmistakable force, citing the ‘Fate’ essay as the supreme expression of Emersonian beatitude and Hermetic self-begetting.

Bloom, Harold, The Daemon Knows: Literary Greatness and the American Sublime, 2015supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The two chief second-best means of freedom that Emerson found were ‘obedience to his genius’ and ‘the habit of the observer’—Vocation and Intellect.

Bloom identifies Emerson’s two primary strategies for liberation — genius-obedience and observational habit — as the structural principles that generate his Orphic poetics of surprise and freedom.

Bloom, Harold, The Daemon Knows: Literary Greatness and the American Sublime, 2015supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Emerson, speaking for American hope, urged otherwise, exalting the newness. Whitman, more Emersonian than Emerson himself, proclaims two Supreme Fictions in Song of Myself.

Bloom positions Emerson as the prophet of American newness against the fatalism of time, and Whitman as the hyper-Emersonian fulfillment of that prophetic tradition.

Bloom, Harold, The Daemon Knows: Literary Greatness and the American Sublime, 2015supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The soul raised over passion beholds identity and eternal causation, perceives the self-existence of Truth and Right, and calms itself with knowing that all things go well.

This passage from Emerson’s ‘Self-Reliance,’ quoted at length by Bloom, exemplifies the daemonic register of visionary calm that Bloom identifies as Emerson’s highest mode.

Bloom, Harold, The Daemon Knows: Literary Greatness and the American Sublime, 2015supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Emerson describes such a situation in the following lines from his poem ‘Uriel.’ … ‘Evil will bless, and ice will burn.’ … The bounds of good and ill were rent; Strong Hades could not keep his own, But all slid to confusion.

Edinger uses Emerson’s ‘Uriel’ to illustrate how the dissolution of boundaries in separatio unleashes the coincidentia oppositorum — an alchemical condition in which good and evil, hot and cold, collapse into undifferentiated confusion.

Edinger, Edward F., Anatomy of the Psyche: Alchemical Symbolism in Psychotherapy, 1985supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms