Duck

the duck, strangely enough, especially in fairy tales which are concerned with the problem of evil, comes up as a saving factor; and, at least in European countries, the duck seems to be connected in one way with the principle of evil and in another way with that which rescues one from evil.

Von Franz establishes the duck’s fundamental ambivalence in European fairy-tale symbolism — simultaneously aligned with evil (witches, devils) and with deliverance from evil — while noting its tripartite mobility across land, water, and air as the basis for its symbolic range.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Shadow and Evil in Fairy Tales, 1974thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

In the island-duck-story the giant represents destructive emotion. Had the giant and this church-duck with the egg in it lived nearer each other, had they been closer together, they would have been incompatible.

Von Franz reads the duck containing the giant’s hidden soul as the locus of an incompatible life-principle — a ‘compartment psychology’ in which the source of one’s power is structurally kept apart from one’s destructive actions.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Shadow and Evil in Fairy Tales, 1974thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

She said she would turn herself into a big pond of milk. He must be a duck and always swim right in the middle and keep his head under the milk and never look out; if he looked out for one second, he would be lost.

In a shape-shifting flight from the Devil, the duck form is the required posture of concealment and non-looking — a specific discipline of consciousness that protects the hero from demonic power.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Shadow and Evil in Fairy Tales, 1974thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The stepdaughter was not drowned, however. She turned into a white duck, which for three nights appeared to the king’s kitchen boy and talked with him.

In a Polish tale analyzed by von Franz, the duck serves as the transformed vessel of the innocent heroine’s soul — a metamorphic survival form that bridges death and restoration.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, The Interpretation of Fairy Tales, 1970supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

we have here, before the creature is even half grown, a duckling with a massive psychological complex. Girl children who display a strong instinctive nature often experience significant suffering in early life.

Estés uses the ugly duckling as a clinical-mythological figure for the psychologically wounded wild-natured woman, whose exile from her community constitutes a primal complex formed through no fault of her own.

Clarissa Pinkola Estés, Ph D, Women Who Run With the Wolves Myths and Stories of the Wild, 2017thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the duck mother is psychically divided and this causes her to be pulled in several different directions, which is what ambivalen

Estés reads the duck mother’s collapse of nurturing as a figure of maternal ambivalence produced by communal coercion — the community’s hostile gaze severing the instinctual mother-child bond.

Clarissa Pinkola Estés, Ph D, Women Who Run With the Wolves Myths and Stories of the Wild, 2017supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The uncombed cat and the cross-eyed hen find the duckling’s aspirations stupid and nonsensical. It gives just the right perspective on the touchiness and the values of others who denigrate those who are not like themselves.

Estés identifies the farmyard creatures’ rejection of the duckling as a structural illustration of how incompatibility of nature — not inferiority — drives exile, with the exiled one falsely internalizing the judgment.

Clarissa Pinkola Estés, Ph D, Women Who Run With the Wolves Myths and Stories of the Wild, 2017supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

a little duck hatches from its egg, the first moving creature it sees becomes, as it were, its parent. It attaches itself to this figure, and then this attachment cannot be erased.

Campbell deploys duckling imprinting as a biological analogue distinguishing individual imprint from archetypal stereotype, using it to illuminate Jung’s concept of the archetype as a collective image releasing energy independent of experience.

Campbell, Joseph, Pathways to Bliss: Mythology and Personal Transformation, 2004supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Hess (1959) exposed several groups of ducklings to a moving decoy duck, a model of a male mallard, at various ages. The ducklings were allowed to follow the decoy around a circular track for about an hour.

The duckling imprinting experiments are cited to establish the empirical behavioral basis for the concept of a critical developmental period, relevant to depth-psychological discussions of early bonding and archetypal attachment.

James, William, The Principles of Psychology, 1890supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

although the duck’s legs are short, to lengthen them would cause it grief, and, although the crane’s legs are long, to cut them down would cause it distress. Therefore, what is by nature long is not something that should be cut down.

The Zhuangzi passage, cited in Wang Bi’s I Ching commentary, uses the duck’s naturally short legs as a Taoist argument for non-interference with innate nature — a philosophical position resonant with depth psychology’s respect for the organism’s given constitution.

Wang Bi, Richard John Lynn, The Classic of Changes: A New Translation of the I Ching as Interpreted by Wang Bi, 1994supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

he saw on a pond two little ducks. He caught one and wanted to wring its neck to have something to eat. But the old duck swam out of the bushes and implored him to have pity on her dear children.

The fairy-tale duck who appeals to the hero’s compassion and promises future aid represents one of the animal-helper figures whose sparing initiates a chain of reciprocal assistance central to the tale’s moral economy.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Shadow and Evil in Fairy Tales, 1974supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

when the ugly duckling took to the water with the other offspring, the duck mother saw that he swam straight and true. ‘Yes, he’s one of my own, even though he’s very peculiar in appearance.’

The duck mother’s brief recognition of the ugly duckling’s competence in water — his true element — illustrates how natural aptitude momentarily overrides social misrecognition before communal pressure reasserts itself.

Clarissa Pinkola Estés, Ph D, Women Who Run With the Wolves Myths and Stories of the Wild, 2017supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

on a pond nearby, the water became warmer and the ugly duckling who floated there stretched his wings. How strong and big his wings were. They lifted him high over the land.

The duckling’s transformation and flight in spring figures the soul’s recovery of its true nature after a winter of exile — the instinctual self revealed through ordeal rather than destroyed by it.

Clarissa Pinkola Estés, Ph D, Women Who Run With the Wolves Myths and Stories of the Wild, 2017aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

When he looked at these, to his annoyance, he was holding in each hand a scabby-mouthed duck. In no way perturbed, however, he shouted, ‘Ha, ha, this is the way a man acts! Indeed these ducks will make fine soup to drink!’

In the Winnebago Trickster cycle, the duck appears as prey inadvertently captured through the Trickster’s blundering, serving the narrative’s comic-deflating function rather than carrying independent symbolic weight.

Radin, Paul, The Trickster: A Study in American Indian Mythology, 1956aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →