Within the depth-psychology corpus, drought functions as a polysemous symbol operating simultaneously on cosmological, psychological, and ritual planes. Its most concentrated theoretical treatment appears in Jung’s own writings, where it marks the condition of psychic aridness — the soul starved of inner life — and in the celebrated Wilhelm rainmaker anecdote, which von Franz transmits as paradigmatic of the analyst’s obligation to restore inner order before outer conditions can change. The Jungian axis thus reads drought not as mere meteorological misfortune but as a symptom of collective dissociation from the unconscious, a fall from Tao or Self-alignment. Eliade broadens this frame: in extremis, when drought, storm, or epidemic overwhelm every lesser religious resource, archaic humanity turns again toward the supreme, transcendent deity — a pattern repeated across cultures and confirming drought as the crucible of highest religious need. Moore’s Jungian-archetypal reading situates drought within the mythological logic of the King archetype: the failure of creative, generative ordering produces aridness, while its restoration — as in Baal’s defeat of chaos — inaugurates rainfall and fertility. At the margins, Schwartz applies the figure idiomatically to family therapy (a ‘leadership drought’), and Schoen names Set as the mythic ‘bringer of drought,’ anchoring the term within an archetypal evil complex. Across voices, drought consistently signals a rupture in the living flow between psyche and world.