The dose-response relationship appears across the depth-psychology corpus as a structuring principle that bridges pharmacological precision and phenomenological complexity. Rather than treating dosage as a mere quantitative variable, the authors engaging this concept reveal that dose-response logic imports assumptions about linearity, threshold effects, and biological determinism into domains — psychedelic research, trauma epidemiology, addiction treatment, and nature therapy — where such assumptions require examination. Rick Strassman’s DMT investigations represent the most sustained engagement, deploying classical dose-response methodology (placebo, low, medium, high) to chart the gradient from mild visionary phenomena to full ontological dissolution, while simultaneously discovering that subjective experience resists simple proportionality. Felitti’s ACE study translates the concept into a psychosocial register, demonstrating that cumulative childhood adversity produces graded increases in adult health risk that function like a toxic exposure curve. Simpson’s treatment-outcome research borrows the idiom for therapeutic dose — duration and intensity of engagement — while Bettmann applies it to nature exposure as mental health intervention. Across these contexts, the term anchors the aspiration toward quantitative rigor while the evidence repeatedly surfaces non-linearities, threshold phenomena, individual variability, and qualitative discontinuities that exceed the model’s explanatory reach.