DNA enters the depth-psychology corpus along several distinct vectors, none of them reducible to mere biochemical annotation. In the neuroscientific lineage represented by Kandel, DNA functions as the foundational substrate of memory, hereditary disease, and ultimately mind itself — the molecule whose elucidation transformed biology from the study of energy transformation to the study of information. Panksepp enshrines it within the ‘central dogma’ (DNA → RNA → protein → everything else), framing it as the biochemical ground of all psychobiological process. Against this informational-reductionist reading, Thompson, drawing on Maturana and Varela, mounts a sustained critique: the gene-as-program metaphor mistakes a useful heuristic abbreviation for an accurate description, eliding the autopoietic cellular dynamics within which DNA is itself a product. McGilchrist extends this critique philosophically, insisting that DNA is a three-dimensional relational process, not a readable string, and that genocentrism systematically misrepresents the organism. In the Jungian lineage, Samuels documents Stevens’s provocative proposal that DNA is ‘the replicable archetype of the species,’ collapsing the archetype concept into molecular biology. Most strikingly, Strassman records DMT subjects spontaneously reporting visionary encounters with DNA imagery — double helices, spirals, cellular interiors — suggesting the molecule has acquired archetypal resonance within psychedelic phenomenology. The term thus marks a tension between reductive genetic determinism and more holistic, process-oriented, or transpersonal readings of biological inheritance.