The Divine Encounter occupies a structurally pivotal position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as clinical datum, mythological archetype, and philosophical category. Edinger treats it with the greatest systematic precision, identifying it as the constitutive event in individuation: the ego’s collision with the Greater Personality — the Self — which wounds, humbles, and ultimately transforms the conscious subject. His reading of Jacob at Peniel stands as the paradigm case, distilling four irreducible features: superior being, wounding, perseverance, and revelation. James documents the encounter as a recurring phenomenological reality across traditions, consistently characterized by passivity, overwhelming presence, and transformative aftermath. Corbin, drawing on Ibn ‘Arabi, displaces the encounter from a simple ego-Other dyad into the more complex logic of theophany: one does not meet the Divine Essence directly but rather encounters the ‘Form of God,’ the angelophany constitutive of one’s own being — making every genuine divine encounter simultaneously a self-revelation. McGilchrist repositions the encounter within a broader phenomenology of transcendence, insisting on its ordinariness and resistance to the ‘super’-natural frame. The central tension across the corpus is epistemological: whether the Divine Encounter is an event in which something genuinely other is met, or whether it is, as Jung and Corbin each suggest in their different vocabularies, the Self encountering itself through the medium of depth.