Dismemberment occupies a privileged and contested position across the depth-psychological corpus, functioning simultaneously as mythic motif, alchemical operation, initiatory ordeal, and logical-ontological movement. Jung grounds the term in the visions of Zosimos and the Dionysian mythology, reading it as a body metaphor for psychic division in which the pneuma distributed throughout the complexes is activated precisely through the rending of the central governing principle. Hillman extends this reading, arguing that dismemberment — rather than wholeness — is the condition of a localized, organ-consciousness through which healing paradoxically proceeds: consciousness breaks through dismemberment, not in spite of it. Neumann situates the term within the archaic fertility complex, mapping it onto Osirian mythology and the matriarchal sphere where phallic dismemberment, castration, and reconstitution form a symbolic canon tied to the development of ego consciousness. Edinger reads it as a transformative alchemical process whereby original unconscious unity submits to dispersal for the sake of conscious assimilation. Giegerich radicalizes the concept most thoroughly, arguing — through the Actaion myth — that Dionysian dismemberment is not a phase in a process but the Alpha and Omega of the soul’s logical movement: the dissolution of ontology into logic, of the image into its own notional ground. Taken together, these voices reveal a fundamental tension between dismemberment as a phase to be survived and transcended (Neumann, Edinger) and dismemberment as the very structure of psychological truth itself (Giegerich, Hillman).