Devotion occupies a remarkably varied and theoretically rich position across the depth-psychology corpus. At its most architectonic, it appears in Aurobindo’s integral yoga as the structural principle of bhakti: a consecrated self-giving through which the entirety of human affect is redirected toward the Divine, purifying emotion from egoistic distortion and culminating in union. Bryant’s exegesis of Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras identifies isvara-pranidhana — surrender or devotion to the Lord — as the supreme among the niyamas and the singular accelerant of samadhi, a position Vacaspati Misra elevates above all other practices. Welwood repositions devotion within a psychological register, reading it as a transformative fire that, when sustained toward an object one cannot possess — God, master, or beloved — refines rather than addicts, liberating love from fixation into the fullness of one’s own nature. Jung, in the Red Book, treats voluntary devotion as the psychic mechanism that dissolves compulsive commingling: freely offered devotion produces dismemberment and thereby true bonding, in contrast to bondage arising from unlived love. Benveniste’s etymological archaeology recovers the Indo-European root of sraddha as precisely ‘devotion’ in its archaic sense — a ritual pledging of self in combat. Cassian’s monastic strand traces devotion’s historical institutionalization in books of prayer and popular cult. Across these axes — yogic, psychological, etymological, monastic — the corpus registers devotion as both dangerous and salvific: a concentrated libidinal vector whose direction and quality determine whether it becomes addiction, transformation, or liberation.