Within the depth-psychology and comparative religion corpus, Delphi functions not merely as a geographical site but as the archetypal locus of oracular mediation between the human and the divine — a place where the boundaries of consciousness, possession, and prophetic inspiration are most acutely theorized. Burkert treats Delphi as a ritual center of extraordinary durability, its cultic forms persisting virtually unchanged for eight centuries, its symbolic core — Hestia, the tripod, the omphalos — readable as sacrificial monument and axis mundi simultaneously. Kerényi deepens this reading by insisting that Delphi belonged to Dionysos no less than to Apollo, a co-habitation attested by Plutarch and encoded in the temple’s pediments. Otto concurs, arguing that the most significant impulses vitalizing Dionysiac cult issued precisely from Delphic Apollo. Jaynes situates Delphi within his schema of oracular decadence, tracing the Pythia’s trance as a late, increasingly mediated form of what was once direct bicameral hearing. Rohde identifies Delphi as the institutional regulator of hero-cult, soul-cult, and the worship of Dionysos in Attica. Nagy reads the Delphic oracle as a Panhellenic coordinating institution that organized colonial and martial enterprises, lending the site cosmological and political weight. Harrison excavates the omphalos and the Ennaeteric festivals as evidence for a pre-Apolline stratum of earth-goddess religion. Dodds sees in Plato’s deference to Delphi an attempt to institutionalize cathartic ritual under a canonical authority. The site thus condenses questions about prophetic ecstasy, the chthonic substrate of Olympian religion, and the political theology of the Panhellenic world.