Death Dread occupies a structural center in the depth-psychological corpus, functioning not merely as a clinical symptom but as what Yalom terms a ‘primal source of anxiety’ — an ontological given that generates the full architecture of neurotic defense. The literature divides broadly along two axes: those who, following Freud’s evasions, subordinate death anxiety to libidinal theory and thereby create what Yalom names a ‘cult of death denial,’ and those who insist on its primacy as irreducible. Yalom is the most systematic voice, tracing how raw death anxiety is buried beneath layers of displacement, sublimation, and conversion, erupting only when life’s ‘jolting experiences’ tear the curtain of defense. Hillman approaches from the archetypal pole, treating the dread of death as intimately bound to the soul’s own logic — neither pathology to be extinguished nor instinct to be sublimated, but a dimension of psychic depth requiring phenomenological fidelity rather than medical suppression. The NARM tradition, represented here by Heller, reframes death dread as ‘nameless dread,’ a somatic residue of early developmental trauma misrecognized by consciousness as discrete threat. Across these divergent frameworks, two structural tensions persist: whether death anxiety is primary or derivative, and whether its therapeutic aim is desensitization and confrontation or deepened acquaintance with the soul’s relationship to finitude.