Dance occupies a remarkably capacious position within the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as cosmological symbol, ritual technology, somatic therapy, psychological metaphor, and emblem of the individuation process itself. From Neumann’s documentation of orgiastic Goddess worship to von Franz’s analysis of fairy-tale princesses dancing with trolls, the tradition consistently reads dance as the corporeal expression of psychic movement — a medium through which the unconscious becomes enacted rather than merely contemplated. Woodman foregrounds the somatic dimension most insistently, treating dance as the site where rational and intuitive modes dissolve into embodied wholeness, where ‘feeling is moulded into form.’ Harrison and Dodds, writing from the history-of-religion flank, establish dance’s archaic power as simultaneously dangerous and sacred — a technology of possession, group cohesion, and divine seizure that precedes theological articulation entirely. T.S. Eliot’s line, mediated through Woodman, — ‘There would be no dance, and there is only the dance’ — crystallises the paradox the corpus keeps returning to: the still point and the movement are indissociable. Estes and Jung/Kerenyi extend the term into mythological narrative, where the dance-place becomes a threshold between birth and death. Miller deploys the metaphor therapeutically, making ‘the dance’ a governing image for the relational dynamics of motivational interviewing. The tensions are real: dance redeems (von Franz, Neumann) but also compels and destroys (Estes on red-shoe compulsion, Dodds on dancing madness).