Daimons

The soul of each of us is given a unique daimon before we are born, and it has selected an image or pattern that we live on earth. This soul-companion, the daimon, guides us here; in the process of arrival, however, we forget all that took place and believe we come empty into this world.

Hillman’s acorn theory posits the daimon as the pre-natal soul-companion carrying destiny, whose guidance is obscured by the amnesia of incarnation.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

They are the envoys and interpreters that ply between heaven and earth, flying upward with our worship and our prayers, and descending with the heavenly answers and commandments… it is only through the mediation of the spirit world that man can have any intercourse, whether waking or sleeping, with the gods.

Kalsched, citing Plato’s Symposium via von Franz, establishes the daimon’s constitutive function as intermediary between the divine and human realms, the structural foundation for depth psychology’s metaxy.

Kalsched, Donald, The Inner World of Trauma: Archetypal Defences of the Personal Spirit, 1996thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The mother and the Phallos are superhuman daimons that reveal the world of the Gods. They affect us more than the Gods since they are closely akin to our essence… they possess and encompass you, since they are powerful daimons, manifestations of the Gods, and hence reach beyond you, existing in themselves.

Jung’s Red Book identifies spirituality and sexuality as archetypal daimons that transcend individual possession, demanding differentiation rather than identification.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Red Book: Liber Novus, 2009thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

What seems to have particularly occupied the Neoplatonist writers was the relation between Gods and daimons… Gods are supposedly transcendent, daimons immanent, or at least in the middle realm. Thus the distinction involves the more fundamental issue of noumenon and phenomenon.

Hillman situates the daimon in the Neoplatonic metaxy between transcendent gods and immanent phenomena, aligning Jung’s imaginal figures with this philosophical tradition.

Hillman, James, Healing Fiction, 1983thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The daimon part is easy enough, for we have already accepted the translation of daimon as genius (Latin) and then transposed it into more modern terms such as ‘angel,’ ‘soul,’ ‘paradigm,’ ‘image,’ ‘fate,’ ‘inner twin,’ ‘acorn,’ ‘life companion,’ ‘guardian,’ ‘heart’s calling.’

Hillman surveys the cross-cultural and historical synonyms for the daimon, demonstrating its irreducible multiplicity as a personified imaginal spirit identical with personal fate.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The ordinary man sees only what happens to him, unpredictable and not of his own enacting, and he calls the driving power daimon, something like fate, but without any person who plans and ordains being visible.

Burkert establishes the phenomenological core of the Greek daimon as the experience of an unaccountable, impersonal driving force identical with fate yet lacking a visible agent.

Burkert, Walter, Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical, 1977thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Daemons, like liquid and air, are part of the fabric of the world. Tragic audiences expected daemons both inside, in their innards, and outside, in the environment. From the visible surfaces of world or person, they inferred the unseen presences of daemon.

Padel argues that in fifth-century Greek tragic consciousness, daimons were a pervasive ontological reality inhabiting both inner and outer worlds, not merely personifications.

Padel, Ruth, In and Out of the Mind Greek Images of the Tragic Self, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The dogmatic crystallization of our religious culture demonized the daimons. As a fundamental component of polytheistic paganism, they had to be negated and denied by Christian theology which projected its repression upon the daimons, calling them the forces of denial and negation.

Hillman traces the historical demonization of the classical daimon by Christian theology, framing Jung’s return to imaginal figures as a recovery of suppressed psychological reality.

Hillman, James, Healing Fiction, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Socrates and Plato also distinguished between the goddess Necessity and her children, the Moirai, and another kind of deterministic force in human affairs. This latter they called the daimon (also spelled daemon)… The daemon (genius) of a person retains the element of beneficent power, of functional tap.

Greene distinguishes the Greek daimon from Moira and ker as specifically a beneficent individual genius, marking the positive, guiding dimension of personal fate in Platonic cosmology.

Liz Greene, The Astrology of Fate, 1984supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

I have let Jaspers lead the charge against the daimons, but I could have called also upon Karl Barth who describes the daimons as powers of chaos and forces of negativity that lie and deny, since the ‘triumph of Jesus Christ over the daemons, they have no more to say.’

Hillman catalogues the major theological and philosophical attacks on the daimons — Jaspers, Barth, Teilhard — to define the polemical context against which depth psychology’s rehabilitation of the concept operates.

Hillman, James, Healing Fiction, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Why should you keep silent about the others? Because there would be plenty to discuss concerning your own daimons… What are daimons, who don’t act out of themselves? So let them go to work, but not through you, or else you yourself will become a daimon to others.

Jung’s Red Book issues a warning against identification with or appropriation of others’ daimons, emphasizing that the daimon must act autonomously to remain a genuine psychic force rather than an ego-inflation.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Red Book: Liber Novus, 2009supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Demonism arises, not because of supposed or actual sexual dysfunction, but because of the dysfunctional relation with the daimon. We strive to fulfill its vision fully, refusing to be restrained by our human limitations — in other words, we develop megalomania.

Hillman reframes demonism and megalomania as pathological outcomes of an unmediated relation to the daimon’s demand, displacing psychosexual etiologies with a theory of daimonic excess.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Janet tricked the inner daimon (through automatic writing) into cooperating with the treatment and taking over the actual hypnosis of the patient from within… Janet summarizes the case by saying that the true illness of the patient did not lie in the daimon; instead, the true illness was remorse.

Kalsched reads Janet’s clinical case as evidence that inner daimons, when negotiated rather than suppressed, reveal themselves as secondary to the underlying trauma, pointing toward a therapeutic approach respecting daimonic autonomy.

Kalsched, Donald, The Inner World of Trauma: Archetypal Defences of the Personal Spirit, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

To reflect upon Hitler is to do more than present a case study in psychopathy or political tyranny… It is a ritual act of psychological discovery, an act as necessary to the claim of being a conscious human.

Hillman treats the demonic calling — as embodied in Hitler — as requiring psychological reflection on the destructive potential of the daimon when operating without ethical constraint.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

If a person is too eager for it, his daimon willingly leads him astray into great wrong-doing and easily makes him think that what is evil is good and what is useful is bad.

Sullivan documents the archaic Greek view, found in Theognis, of the daimon as a morally ambiguous guardian capable of leading its host astray when the host’s desires become excessive.

Sullivan, Shirley Darcus, Psychological and Ethical Ideas What Early Greeks Say, 1995supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The cult of the collective daimon, the king and the fertility-spirit is primary, Homer’s conception of the hero as the gallant individual, the soldier of fortune or the gentleman of property, is secondary and late.

Harrison argues that the individualized Homeric hero represents a later derivation from the more archaic collective daimon of royal fertility cult, situating personal daimonology within a social-religious evolution.

Harrison, Jane Ellen, Themis: A Study of the Social Origins of Greek Religion, 1912supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

This accomplishment was not a wilful resurrection of myths and daimons, nor an act of heresy, mystical politics, or magic theurgy, as Jaspers’ critique implies. Rather, Jung’s occupation with daimons came from the necessity of his fate breaking through in a psychopathological crisis.

Hillman defends Jung’s engagement with daimons as psychologically necessitated by his personal pathology rather than as a deliberate ideological maneuver, legitimating the daimonic encounter as clinical data.

Hillman, James, Healing Fiction, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Greed for the sake of greed, power for the sake of power, pleasure for the sake of pleasure, immoderation and insatiableness: this is how one recognizes you, you daimons.

Jung’s Red Book characterizes daimons by their excess and insatiability, articulating an experiential criterion for recognizing daimonic possession through the collapse of measure and reciprocity.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Red Book: Liber Novus, 2009supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Fourth: ‘Demonology is submerged in nature.’ Yes, says Jung, this is precisely what active imagination intends to do: submerge modern man again into nature for this is what he has lost — the archaic, instinctual response.

Hillman turns Jaspers’ critique of demonology’s immersion in nature into a positive statement about active imagination’s restorative function vis-à-vis instinctual, archetypal reality.

Hillman, James, Healing Fiction, 1983aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Being and power and reality are invested in images. They are numinous because they are animated, soul-charged, whether shaped into external icons or imagined and spoken with in soul.

Hillman connects the numinosity of daimonic images to their soul-charged animation, linking iconophilic theology to the depth-psychological status of imaginal figures.

Hillman, James, Healing Fiction, 1983aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →