The term ‘Cup’ occupies a remarkably multivalent position in the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a vessel of fate, a symbol of receptivity, and a ritualized container of transformation. The Gethsemane cup — ‘let this cup pass from me’ — recurs across Edinger, John of Damascus, and related Christological commentary as the paradigmatic figure of ego-confrontation with destiny: the dread of what must be consciously drunk rather than evaded. Woodman reads the cup in its Grail aspect as the female inheritance of nourishment and love, denied and then restored through the archetypal feminine; her analysis connects the cup explicitly to Venus, to copper, and to the capacity for genuine receiving. Jung and his Aion commentary locate the cup within Gnostic cosmology as the divination vessel of a cosmic Logos — ‘the cup from which the king, drinking, draws his omens’ — binding the symbol to hermaphroditic quaternities and the mystery of consciousness. Jodorowsky’s Tarot analysis treats the Ace of Cups as totality-in-potential, the whole emotional life of the soul gathered in a single archetypal image. Classical sources (Plato’s Phaedo, Homer, Onians) provide the pharmakological and sacrificial grounds: the cup of hemlock, cups overturned by divine sleep, the Roman equation of wine-cups with years of life. Etymological and Tibetan material extends the range toward skull-cups, drinking bowls, and the hollow vessel as such. What unites these positions is the cup as a bounded hollow — a form that receives, transmits, and transforms whatever is poured into or demanded of the self.