Crystal occupies a remarkably diverse semantic field within the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as symbol, material substrate, philosophical analogue, and ritual instrument. Jung anchors the term most decisively to the Self: in ‘Man and His Symbols’ he observes that the crystal’s mathematically precise internal arrangement evokes an intuitive sense of spiritual ordering even within apparently dead matter, making it an apt symbol for the union of matter and spirit and, by extension, the nuclear center of the psyche. This symbolic reading is amplified in alchemical hermeneutics — Abraham’s ‘Dictionary of Alchemical Imagery’ identifies crystal as a name for the philosopher’s stone, while the Mysterium Coniunctionis situates crystal within patristic and alchemical chains of imagery linking incorruptibility, resurrection, and the hardening of the fluid into the permanent. Eliade, approaching from the history of religions, documents the celestial provenance of rock crystals in shamanic initiatory complexes worldwide: crystals are ‘solidified light’ fallen from the sky god’s throne, serving as vessels for healing spirits and diagnostic vision. Simondon, by contrast, treats crystallization as the paradigm case for understanding physical individuation — the passage from amorphous to structured being — investing the term with ontogenetic rather than symbolic weight. Greer’s practical-esoteric deployment of crystals as psychic amplifiers, healing instruments, and meditational foci represents yet another register, bridging popular metaphysics with Tarot hermeneutics. The corpus thus reveals crystal as a site where symbolic depth psychology, alchemical tradition, shamanic cosmology, and process ontology intersect without full resolution.