Cryptomnesia

The Seba library treats Cryptomnesia in 6 passages, across 3 authors (including Jung, Carl Gustav, Jung, C.G., Jung, C. G.).

In the library

I should say that cryptomnesic reproduction is very unlikely. It appears to be a case of genuine, spontaneous production of a collective archetype.

Jung rules out cryptomnesia as an explanation for specific mediumistic symbolic content, using its implausibility to assert the spontaneous, collective-archetypal origin of the material.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, 1960thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

every single one of them could be explained by the actually existing knowledge in the unconscious (cryptomnesia, clairvoyance, etc.).

Jung positions cryptomnesia as one of several unconscious-knowledge hypotheses available to explain apparently paranormal communications, while simultaneously weighing it against the spirit hypothesis.

Jung, C.G., Letters Volume 1: 1906-1950, 1973thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

every single one of them could be explained by the actually existing knowledge in the unconscious (cryptomnesia, clairvoyance, etc.).

A reiteration, in the later correspondence, of Jung’s epistemically cautious use of cryptomnesia as a naturalistic ceiling against which the spirit hypothesis must be measured.

Jung, C. G., Letters Volume 2, 1951-1961, 1975thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the unconscious seems to contain other things besides personal acquisitions and belongings. My patient was quite unconscious of the derivation of ‘spirit’ from ‘wind,’ or of the parallelism

Without naming cryptomnesia directly, Jung’s observation that patients lack awareness of the sources of their unconscious material gestures toward the conceptual space cryptomnesia occupies in distinguishing personal acquisition from collective inheritance.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Two Essays on Analytical Psychology, 1953aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →