The cosmogonic image occupies a position of singular density within the depth-psychology corpus, operating simultaneously as mythological datum, psychological symbol, and ontological argument. Von Franz treats it most systematically, tracing the image across Vedic, Orphic, Gnostic, and alchemical sources to demonstrate that creation myths are not naïve cosmologies but projections of the psyche’s own originary dynamics — the individuation process in reverse, as she puts it. Eliade approaches the cosmogonic image from the phenomenology of religion, insisting that its ritual recitation is not mere commemoration but genuine reactualization: the combat of Marduk and Tiamat, the Fijian ‘creation of the world,’ the Polynesian cosmogonic recitation each re-enact the passage from chaos to cosmos and thereby regenerate both community and patient. Campbell absorbs both registers, situating the Cosmogonic Cycle as the structural frame of the hero’s journey and identifying the cosmogonic image with the plenum of silence that surrounds all mythic figuration. Jung himself engages the image obliquely but decisively: the cosmogonic Logos of Gnostic quaternities, the cosmogonic significance of consciousness as his ‘new myth,’ and the alchemical process as reversed creation all presuppose that the archetype of origin is a living psychic reality, not a cultural artifact. The central tension is whether the cosmogonic image is a projection of unconscious process onto the heavens or whether it carries an irreducible ontological claim about the self-disclosure of reality.