Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘cord’ is not treated as a simple anatomical or material term but carries a dense symbolic charge rooted in archaic thought about fate, binding, and the ontological tethering of beings to one another and to cosmic forces. Onians’s excavation of Greek peirata (πείρατα) and related spinning imagery establishes the cord as the primordial figure of fate: the thread spun by the gods is simultaneously a bond, a measure, and a limit. The cord that the Fates spin is identical with the cord that fetters—victory, death, and destiny are all conceptualized as things wound, knotted, or loosed. This double nature—cord as connective lifeline and cord as constraining bond—runs through the ritualistic binding imagery Onians documents in mystery cult practice (the krokokon thread, the tainia about the waist of initiates). Neurobiological writers such as Kandel, Craig, Damasio, and Fogel employ ‘cord’ in its anatomical register—spinal cord as the primary conduit of sensory and motor information—yet the structural function is homologous: the cord mediates between periphery and center, body and brain, organism and world. The depth-psychological tension between cord-as-fate (archaic, symbolic) and cord-as-neural-pathway (modern, functional) constitutes the term’s peculiar status in this concordance: a figure that binds cosmological and somatic vocabularies across millennia.