Across the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Contact’ operates on at least three distinct registers that frequently intersect: the neurobiological, the relational-therapeutic, and the structural-metapsychological. In the somatic and trauma traditions — represented most extensively by Heller, Ogden, Levine, and van der Hart — contact designates the moment-to-moment capacity of the organism to engage with its environment and with another person, a capacity that trauma chronically disrupts. Here, contact is inseparable from its negation: the contact-interruption cycle, in which arousal, dissociation, or learned defensive patterning forestalls genuine meeting. Eye contact serves as the paradigmatic microsite where this cycle is observed and therapeutically worked. Ogden introduces the technical device of ‘contact statements’ — spare, present-tense verbal reflections — as instruments for maintaining the client’s awareness at the boundary of self and therapist without triggering interpretive flight. Bion’s contribution is of a different register altogether: his ‘contact-barrier,’ borrowed from Freud’s neurophysiological term for the synapse, is reconceived as the psychic membrane that simultaneously differentiates and relates conscious and unconscious, making dreaming itself a form of contact-maintenance. Van der Hart’s structural dissociation framework treats contact with the therapist as the primary phobic object for chronically traumatized patients. The tension between contact as life-giving and contact as threat constitutes one of the corpus’s most generative dialectics.