Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘consumption’ operates across at least three distinct registers that rarely speak directly to one another yet share a common psychological substrate. In its clinical-pharmacological register, consumption designates measurable alcohol and drug intake — drinking days, heavy-drinking episodes, drinks per occasion — against which the efficacy of interventions such as naltrexone, acamprosate, and omega-3 supplementation is calibrated. Here consumption is a dependent variable, a behavioral metric of disorder and recovery. In its socio-psychological register, pioneered most forcefully by Alexander, consumption names the compensatory hunger of dislocated selves: compulsive acquisition of goods, energy, and experience as substitute for authentic psychosocial integration. This register connects individual pathology to the structural logic of free-market society. In the contemplative-depth register, represented most richly by Easwaran, consumption is a spiritual disease of the senses — the gobbling of experience through ungoverned perception, the rajasic expansion of appetite that hollows out interiority. Thomas Moore provides a synthetic moment, reading disordered eating as the soul’s failed attempt to metabolize outer experience into inner substance. What unites these registers is the recognition that excessive consumption is less about the objects consumed than about the psychic condition — dislocation, sensory enslavement, or soul-hunger — that drives the consuming. The term thus sits at the crossroads of addiction theory, political economy, and contemplative anthropology.