Complex PTSD emerges in the depth-psychology corpus as a diagnostic and clinical construct forged at the intersection of trauma theory, developmental psychology, and dissociation research. Judith Herman’s foundational 1992 work inaugurated the concept, demonstrating that prolonged, repeated interpersonal trauma — particularly childhood abuse — produces a syndrome qualitatively distinct from single-incident PTSD, encompassing affect dysregulation, identity disturbance, relational impairment, dissociation, and shattered systems of meaning. Herman’s associated three-stage recovery model (safety, mourning/remembrance, reconnection) has achieved canonical status, forming the backbone of Expert Consensus Guidelines published by the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Courtois and her collaborators extend Herman’s framework into detailed clinical operationalization, addressing pharmacotherapy, phase-oriented treatment, differential diagnosis from borderline personality disorder and DESNOS, and the persistent problem of stigmatizing misdiagnosis. Van der Hart’s structural dissociation theory situates complex PTSD on a continuum of personality fragmentation more severe than simple PTSD but less pervasive than DID. A central tension running through the corpus concerns nosological legitimacy: whether complex PTSD warrants a discrete diagnosis or is better captured by existing comorbidity clusters. The clinical stakes are high — without formal recognition, these clients risk misdiagnosis, under-treatment, and the compounding injuries of iatrogenic stigma.