Communal Witnessing designates the relational and intersubjective act by which suffering, testimony, or transformative experience is received, held, and amplified within a gathered community rather than absorbed in solitude. Across the depth-psychological corpus, the concept emerges at the intersection of narrative theory, trauma recovery, spiritual formation, and the phenomenology of moral emotion. Frank’s work on illness testimony insists that witnessing is fundamentally embodied and concentric: when one person genuinely receives another’s testimony, that receiver is transformed into a witness in turn, generating ever-widening circles of recognition. Kurtz and Ketcham ground communal witnessing in the Alcoholics Anonymous and broader spiritual-imperfection traditions, arguing that memory itself is communal and that authentic belonging is constituted through the mutual act of telling and hearing. Herman’s trauma work establishes the clinical stakes: the group setting provides the relational container within which shattered meaning can be reconstructed. Keltner and empirical awe researchers illuminate the affective substrate—moral elevation, goose bumps, tears—that is provoked when one witnesses another’s courage or virtue, binding observer to community. McNiff’s art-therapy observations capture the paradox that silent collective viewing can achieve solidarity more powerfully than discursive analysis. Across these positions, the central tension concerns whether communal witnessing is primarily therapeutic, primarily ethical, or primarily constitutive of the self—a question that remains productively unresolved.