Within the depth-psychology corpus, the coat figures as one of the most semantically dense articles of clothing, operating simultaneously on several registers: as persona, as protective covering, as marker of spiritual or moral status, and as archetypal skin. Jung’s treatment in Man and His Symbols anchors the canonical reading: the coat is the outer garment of the persona, designed both to project a chosen impression upon the world and to conceal the inner life from scrutiny. The red coat of the saint-figure in the dream analysis introduces a further complexity — color saturates the garment with affective and libidinal meaning, producing what Jung calls ‘eroticized spirituality.’ Clarissa Pinkola Estés extends this symbolic field, reading clothing in its initiatory dimension: to wash the garments of authority is to comprehend how persona is constructed, how mastery is externally signified. Hillman, approaching the animal coat from an imaginal-biological perspective, reverses the usual hierarchy, insisting that the coat is genetically prior to the eye that perceives it — beauty precedes the beholder. Across these positions a productive tension obtains: is the coat primarily a social mask concealing depth, or is it itself the primary ontological display, anterior to consciousness? Mythological and hagiographic sources add layers of ascetic and demonic valence, dressing saints and devils alike in coats that signal inversion, transformation, or supernatural engagement.