Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘cloth’ operates across three distinct but interrelated registers: the mythic-symbolic, the cosmological-philosophical, and the ritual-funerary. At its most symbolically charged, cloth appears as the medium of fate and deception — nowhere more forcefully than in Penelope’s great cloth in the Odyssey, which Jungian commentators have recognized as an archetype of the psyche’s capacity for creative delay, the weaving and unweaving of the self’s commitments over time. In the Homeric and Pindaric material treated by Onians, the woof-thread (πεῖραρ) is itself fate, the bond laid upon mortals by divine decree, binding life and death into a single textile metaphor. The alchemical and Gnostic streams add further complexity: in the Gospel of Philip, the master-dyer who transforms colored cloths to white literalizes the purificatory work of the opus; in Yoga philosophy (Bryant on Patañjali), a cloth’s aging serves as the paradigmatic illustration of temporal flux and the illusion of stable identity. Funeral cloth — enshrouding the dead, veiling the eyes of corpses, wrapping the bones — carries weight across Greek, Norse, and Egyptian contexts in Onians. Finally, in clinical depth-psychology (Jung, Hillman), cloth figures in dream imagery as the integumentary boundary between death and healing, shame and concealment, and the priapic dynamic of cover and exposure. The term thus weaves together fate, transformation, time, concealment, and the boundary between living and dead.