Civilization occupies a central and contested position in the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as an achievement of psychic organization, a source of irreducible suffering, and a fragile symbolic structure built upon mythic foundations. Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents stands as the paradigmatic text: civilization is the collective enterprise by which Eros binds individuals into larger units, yet this binding necessarily frustrates instinctual life, generating a cultural superego whose demands parallel the individual superego’s tyranny. Jung, writing in Civilization in Transition, reads Western civilization’s discontinuous development — interrupted by the imposition of a spirituality too advanced for its psychological substrate — as producing a structural dissociation between consciousness and the unconscious. Campbell recasts the problem mythologically: civilizations are founded on and dissolve with their operative myths; when the mythic image is questioned or historically discredited, the civilization built upon it collapses. Hillman sharpens this: civilization requires the slaying of the Ogre and rests upon the buried hero, an imaginal rather than historical force. Neumann, characteristically dialectical, sees the collapse of old civilizational forms as necessary birth-pangs of a broader, more genuinely human order. Jaynes offers the most radical thesis, locating civilization’s very origin in the bicameral management of social control through auditory hallucination. Across all these voices, civilization names the psyche writ large — its repressions, its myths, its structural violence, and its fragile beauty.