Childhood occupies a peculiarly contested position in the depth-psychological corpus: it is simultaneously a historical invention, an archetypal structure, a reservoir of psychic wounding, and a mythic orientation of the soul. Hillman insists, with characteristic iconoclasm, that ‘childhood’ as a cultural category is a late construct, and that what is projected onto the child is in fact a psychological realm the adult carries for itself — an imaginal mode of perceiving rather than a biographical era. Moore, following Hillman and Jung, reads the archetypal child as a face of soul whose neglect produces collective suffering and whose honoring demands confrontation with the adult’s own incapacity and lower nature. Von Franz and the Jungian puer tradition understand nostalgia for childhood as a symptom of the mother complex and arrested development, yet also as intimation of something transcendent. Hillman’s acorn theory (The Soul’s Code) reframes childhood pathology as daimonic expression rather than mere deficiency. Against these archetypal readings, the empirical-clinical literature — Felitti’s ACE Study, Herman’s trauma scholarship, and the Lanius volume — documents with epidemiological precision how adverse childhood experiences generate cascading adult disease, addiction, and psychopathology. The resulting tension between childhood as symbolic-imaginal domain and childhood as biographically real wounding site is the defining productive friction of this entry.