Centrality in the depth-psychology corpus is not a simple geometric metaphor but a multi-valent symbol registering the psyche’s most fundamental orientations: cosmic, political, moral, and soteriological. The term appears across several distinct registers. In the Graeco-philosophical tradition traced by Vernant, the center is simultaneously the mythic hearth (Hestia), the political commons of the polis, and the mathematical pivot of rational cosmology — a convergence that discloses how spatial organization mirrors social and psychological order. In Chinese thought mediated through Wang Bi’s I Ching commentary, centrality (zhong) is an ethical-ontological virtue: to occupy the ‘middle position’ is to embody impartiality, rectitude, and moral authority; to lose centrality is to lose one’s capacity for governance of self and world. The cosmological dimension appears in Plotinus, Plato’s Timaeus, and von Franz, where the center of the sphere becomes a figure for the soul’s relationship to the One — a rest within motion. Rank and Eliade extend centrality into sacred geography: the omphalos, the navel of the earth, the axis mundi as projections of psychological needs for orientation. Singer’s narrative-identity research invokes centrality in a modern empirical register, arguing that narrative is central to identity formation. What unites these voices is the shared intuition that centrality names the condition of psychological and cosmic ordering: wherever a true center is found or lost, the stakes are those of the soul.