The term ‘Center’ traverses the depth-psychology corpus along several distinct but converging axes. In the cosmological-religious register, Mircea Eliade establishes the Center as the axis mundi — the sacred mountain, temple, or holy city standing at the intersection of heaven, earth, and underworld — a point where the profane is abolished and genuine reality is disclosed. This archaic symbolism of the omphalos and the navel of the earth recurs across shamanic, Hindu, Buddhist, and Greek sources, indicating the Center as a nearly universal organizer of sacred space. In the Jungian psychological register, the Center migrates inward: the mandala’s central luminosity becomes the protective temenos of the personality, guarding psychic coherence against dissolution. Jung and his commentators (von Franz, Chodorow) treat the Center as the Self’s gravitational locus — the still point toward which circumambulatio orients the individuation process. Jean-Pierre Vernant charts a third trajectory, showing how the Greek political imagination transposed cosmological centrality into civic geometry: the hearth (Hestia), the agora, and Cleisthenes’s reforms all instantiate a secular, isonomic center that organizes equal citizens in reciprocal space. Hillman complicates the valorization by reading ‘center’ etymologically as a goad — the kentron — arguing that modern urban ‘center city’ rhetoric drives people forward like beasts rather than gathering them in genuine community. Together these voices illuminate the Center as simultaneously cosmic axis, psychological Self, political symmetry, and ideological spur.