Within the depth-psychology corpus, the Bomb — most frequently the nuclear or atomic bomb — functions not merely as a historical or political datum but as a charged psychological and archetypal symbol of the first order. Jung himself, writing with evident urgency in his Letters, situated the bomb at the threshold of civilizational self-destruction, linking it to chiliastic expectations, the aeon of Pisces, and the catastrophic potential of unconscious mass psychology. For Hillman, the bomb demands a specifically imaginal response: held as image rather than as military instrument or apocalyptic literalism, it becomes the supreme 'god-term' of modernity — omnipotent, requiring imaginative propitiation, and constituting nothing less than a challenge to transubstantiate literal destructive power into imago dei. Giegerich, whose work is cited by both Hillman and the Archetypal Psychology bibliography, extended this inquiry into the bomb's imaginal prehistory and its entanglement with the fate of God. Hillman further reads the bomb historically through the paradox of American anti-war violence — a bomb to end bombs — while von Franz and Stein index it more soberly as a marker of the archetype's transgressive reach into the non-psychic. Woodman deploys 'time bomb' as a clinical metaphor for intergenerational maternal wounding. Together these positions reveal a field in which the bomb concentrates debates about imagination, apocalypse, the god-image, shadow projection, and the fate of Western consciousness.
In the library
12 passages
The translation of bomb into the imagination is a transubstantiation of god to imago dei, deliteralizing the ultimate god-term from positivism to negative theology, a god that is all images.
Hillman argues that containing the nuclear bomb within imagination — rather than surrendering it to military or apocalyptic literalism — constitutes a necessary act of psychological and theological transformation, converting the bomb from a positivist threat into an image of the divine.
The suicide of human civilization has moved appreciably closer, and chain reactions will be discovered in the future which will endanger the planet.
Jung treats the atomic and plutonium bomb as the concrete instrument of civilizational self-annihilation, situating its emergence within the astrological and psychological crisis of the aeon of Pisces and the failure of unconscious mass psychology.
Jung, C. G., Letters Volume 2, 1951-1961, 1975thesis
Civilized humanity will soon have arrived at the crossroads where it can use the atom bomb... the suicide of human civilization has moved appreciably closer.
An earlier iteration of Jung's urgent warning that the atom bomb places civilization at a crossroads of self-destruction, underscoring the need for religious — rather than merely rational — containment of psychic energy.
Wanting to put a stop to it was a major cause of the Los Alamos project and Truman's decision to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki, a bomb to 'save lives,' a bomb to end bombs.
Hillman diagnoses the American cultural unconscious as inherently anti-martial, reading the decision to bomb Hiroshima as a psychologically paradoxical violence against war itself — a doublespeak that reveals the shadow of American idealism.
A bomb to 'save lives,' a bomb to end bombs, like the idea of a war to end all wars... Our so-called double-speak about armaments as 'peacemakers' reflects truly how we think.
Hillman extends his analysis of the bomb as a symptom of the American psyche's anti-martial idealism that paradoxically deploys maximal violence in the name of peace.
Hillman, James, A Blue Fire: The Essential James Hillman, 1989supporting
'The Nuclear Bomb and the Fate of God,' Spring: An Annual of Archetypal Psychology and Jungian Thought (1985)... 'The Invention of Explosive Power and the Blueprint of the Bomb: A Chapter in the Imaginal Pre-History of Our Nuclear Predicament.'
The bibliography records Giegerich's foundational archetypal-psychological essays treating the nuclear bomb as both a theological and imaginal problem, establishing the scholarly lineage within which Hillman's own treatment operates.
'The Nuclear Bomb and the Fate of God,' Spring: An Annual of Archetypal Psychology and Jungian Thought (1985)... 'The Invention of Explosive Power and the Blueprint of the Bomb.'
A parallel citation confirming the canonical status of Giegerich's bomb essays within the Archetypal Psychology bibliographic tradition.
Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account, 1983supporting
By the time the Bomb was developed, Tamas was already on the stage. Even in wartime, a certain measure of insensitivity is required to destroy a city of civilians.
Easwaran reads the development and use of the Bomb through the Sankhya-Vedantic lens of tamas — inertia and moral insensitivity — framing the decision to bomb civilian populations as evidence of a darkened collective mind.
Easwaran, Eknath, The Bhagavad Gita for Daily Living: A Verse-by-Verse Commentary, 1975supporting
Stein invokes the atomic bomb as an illustration of Jung's concept of archetypal transgressivity — the way psychic patterns exceed the boundaries of the psyche and manifest in material, world-historical events.
Stein, Murray, Jung's Map of the Soul: An Introduction, 1998supporting
Von Franz's index entry clusters the atomic bomb with atom, atomic physics, and related concepts, confirming the bomb's presence as a named reference point within her study of Jung's mythic significance.
von Franz, Marie-Louise, C.G. Jung: His Myth in Our Time, 1975aside
it works like a time bomb, none of the parties to the crime ever has to pay, for the explosion takes place in slow fusion over the years and creates such widespread and diverse havoc.
Woodman employs the time bomb as a clinical metaphor for the delayed and diffuse psychological devastation wrought by early maternal failure, transposing the bomb's explosive logic into the language of developmental trauma.
Woodman, Marion, Addiction to Perfection: The Still Unravished Bride: A Psychological Study, 1982aside
Political change through warfare has been so sharply delimited by nuclear arsenals, which can produce no political results but only 'total annihilation.'
Through Hannah Arendt's political thought as mediated in this text, the nuclear arsenal is presented as politically sterile — capable only of annihilation, not of generating political outcomes — a judgment that reframes the bomb as the limit-point of political action.
Hannah, Barbara, Encounters with the Soul: Active Imagination as Developed by C. G. Jung, 1981aside