Bluebeard occupies a charged position in the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as fairy tale, diagnostic myth, and map of intrapsychic predation. The figure is treated most extensively by Clarissa Pinkola Estés, who reads the tale as a multi-layered initiation narrative for women, charting the encounter with an internal predatory complex that murders the psyche’s most vital creative and instinctual capacities. For Estés, Bluebeard is not a morality tale about disobedience but a rigorous phenomenology of naïveté, entrapment, recognition, and escape — the forbidden chamber becoming a symbol of the necessity to look directly at destruction loose within one’s own psyche. Marie-Louise von Franz, cited through David Schoen, takes the harder line: Bluebeard represents an untransformable form of archetypal evil, a figure from whom only flight is possible. This creates a productive tension in the corpus — Estés emphasizing transformation of the predator’s rendered energy, von Franz insisting on its essential intractability. Donald Kalsched situates the Bluebeard cycle (via Fitcher’s Bird) within the broader frame of archetypal defenses against trauma, linking it to the self-care system’s violent guardianship of the inner child. Across these readings, the tale functions as a touchstone for discussions of the predatory animus, shadow, psychic naïveté, individuation under duress, and the epistemology of the forbidden.