Blue occupies a singular and elaborately theorized position within the depth-psychological corpus, receiving its most sustained treatment in James Hillman’s alchemical psychology, where it functions simultaneously as a transitional color between nigredo and albedo, as the sovereign color of imagination, and as a condition of soul irreducible to any single valence. Hillman’s reading refuses to stabilize blue: it encompasses the blues of jazz and melancholy, the azure of celestial aspiration, the blue dog’s perverse compulsions, the Blue Virgin’s anima, and the cerulean of Cézanne’s painterly epistemology. What unifies these diverse registers is blue’s ontological claim — not merely a color but, in Heidegger’s formulation as cited by Hillman, holiness itself insofar as it gathers depth while veiling itself. Blue marks the threshold between personal interiority and imaginal world-disclosure; it is the color in which soul vanishes from noun into adjective, becoming a pervasive tonal quality rather than a locatable substance. The Jungian inheritance is also present: blue names the thinking function, the impersonal depths of Sophia, moral philosophy, and truth. Tensions persist between blue as reflective distance and blue as erotic activation, between its Romantic idealism (Novalis’s blue flower) and its Dionysian dissolution (jazz, wine, pornographic cinema). The concordance of voices — Goethe, Kandinsky, Stevens, Cézanne, Miles Davis, Kabbalah, Pauli — testifies to blue’s extraordinary cross-domain authority within this literature.