The blackbird enters the depth-psychology corpus principally as a figure of prophetic and imaginal consciousness, its most decisive articulation belonging to James Hillman, who deploys it—via Wallace Stevens’s ‘Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird’—as an emblem of the polytheistic multiplicity that archetypal psychology demands. For Hillman, Apollo’s blackbird is the bearer of prophetic insight, a condensed symbol for the irreducibility of psychic perspective-taking: just as there are thirteen legitimate ways of regarding the bird, so too are there irreducibly many archetypal dominants through which a single condition such as depression may be understood. Robert Romanyshyn extends this Stevensian motif methodologically, arguing that a genuine poetics of research requires precisely such pluralism of vision—‘at least as many ways of looking at soul as there are ways of looking at a blackbird.’ Robert Bly draws on the same poem to anatomize the sensory impoverishment of Western consciousness, treating Stevens’s blackbird as a pedagogical instrument for the rehabilitation of non-visual perception. David Miller invokes the poem’s structure to illustrate how polytheistic thinking shades and differentiates experience without requiring a contrasting opposite. Beyond the Stevensian orbit, the blackbird appears more obliquely: in Lorenz-derived ethological narrative as an imprinting subject (Panksepp), and in von Franz as a figure whose inner fantasy life remains epistemologically inaccessible to behavioral science. The term thus congregates around questions of multiplicity, prophetic vision, imaginal method, and the limits of empiricist knowing.