The figure of the Black Man occupies a contested and symbolically overdetermined position within the depth-psychology corpus. Across Jungian, archetypal, and alchemical registers, the term operates on at least three distinct planes that commentators rarely disentangle: the racial-sociological (actual persons of African descent encountered in dreams and cultural life), the alchemical-symbolic (the nigredo, the Ethiopian, the Moor as figures of prima materia and mortificatio), and the chthonic-thanatic (the Black Man as personification of death, Thanatos, and the underworld). Hillman proves the most searching critic here, insisting in both The Dream and the Underworld and Alchemical Psychology that Jungian convention has collapsed these registers disastrously, reading racially marked dream figures as mere shadow projections and thereby reproducing the very prejudices analysis should dissolve. Jung’s own texts oscillate between the alchemical use of blackness as transformative phase and unreflective colonial assumptions about ‘primitive’ psychology. Bosnak offers a phenomenological corrective, demonstrating through clinical practice that the dreamer’s prejudice — not the figure’s malice — generates the fear. The alchemical literature, mediated by Abraham and Jung’s Mysterium Coniunctionis, locates the Black Man as Moor or Ethiopian within the nigredo process. The term thus stands at the intersection of depth psychology’s most unresolved tensions: between archetype and stereotype, between symbolic blackness and historical Blackness, between shadow and soul.