The awakened state occupies a privileged and contested position across the depth-psychology corpus. At its most fundamental, the term names a condition of consciousness in which the obscuring structures of ego, confusion, and habitual identification have been dissolved or seen through, revealing what Trungpa identifies as an ever-present ground rather than a manufactured achievement. This anti-constructivist logic — that awakening is uncovered, not produced — recurs across Buddhist-inflected writers and carries significant psychological implications: the awakened state cannot be undone by cause and effect, and thus stands apart from ordinary therapeutic gains. Watts introduces a necessary complication, distinguishing awakening proper from the affective relief that often accompanies it, cautioning against mistaking an incidental emotional release for the structural shift itself. Schwartz, arriving from a Western psychotherapeutic direction, reframes awakening as the experiential consequence of disidentifying from the ‘parts’ system — a repositioning of self rather than an exotic altered state. Masters draws the developmental boundary sharply, distinguishing the sage’s conscious, boundary-transcending awareness from the undifferentiated pre-personal unity of the neonate. Welwood situates the awakened state within a layered topology of grounds — transpersonal, open — connecting it to primordial awareness and no-mind. Taken together, these voices map a field in which awakening is simultaneously a natural ground, a therapeutic outcome, a phenomenological event, and a developmental achievement — each framing carrying distinct clinical and philosophical consequences.