The term ‘Archetypal Encounter’ designates, within the depth-psychological corpus, those moments in which the ego comes into direct, often traumatic or transformative contact with an autonomous content of the collective unconscious — a figure, image, or field that carries numinous power exceeding the personal dimension. The literature is neither uniform nor complacent about such meetings. Edinger, the most systematic voice on this subject, insists that the encounter is structurally dangerous: the Self wounds the ego, and the pattern recapitulates the Job archetype — wounding, endurance, and the possibility of transformation. Crucially, Edinger also argues that archetypal encounters require personal incarnation; the archetype cannot be therapeutically integrated through interpretive depersonalization alone. Jung himself, in both the seminars and The Red Book, documents encounters with autonomous figures — Elijah, Salome, the lion — treating them as events that shatter ordinary consciousness and catalyze what he calls the ‘heroic and archetypal.’ Campbell translates the same dynamic into the grammar of the hero’s journey, where the encounter with the threshold guardian or abyss is the pivot of transformation. Conforti extends the concept into field theory, while Neumann situates archetypal encounters within the developmental arc from dragon fight to individuation. A persistent tension concerns the relationship between the universally archetypal and the irreducibly personal: can encounter be therapeutically managed, or must it simply be endured?