Animaanimus

The terms anima and animus occupy a structural position at the very center of analytical psychology, designating the contrasexual soul-figures through which the individual psyche mediates between conscious personality and the deeper strata of the collective unconscious. Within the depth-psychology corpus, their treatment spans a remarkable arc: from Emma Jung’s careful phenomenological essays distinguishing the masculine logos-function of the animus from the feminine eros-nature of the anima, through C. G. Jung’s ontological claim that these figures are nothing less than the personified collective unconscious, to James Hillman’s sustained anatomization of anima as an autonomous imaginal principle irreducible to gender-complementarity. Hillman’s revisionary move is especially consequential: by tracing the Latin roots — anima as substantive breath, animus as the activity of breathing — he argues that much of what psychology calls ‘ego’ is in fact the animus-half of the syzygy, thereby destabilizing the conventional ego/unconscious binary. Wolfgang Giegerich, by contrast, diagnoses an imaginal psychology that remains pure anima, untouched by animus’s critical-logical moment, and thus incapable of genuine engagement with modernity. The philological anchoring provided by Onians furnishes an independent classical dimension, situating animus in the chest as the breath of consciousness. What unifies the corpus is the conviction that anima and animus are not merely theoretical constructs but living archetypal presences whose interplay constitutes the drama of individuation.

In the library 12 passages

as animus is defined in A Latin Dictionary (Lewis and Short) with the phrase ‘the rational soul in man,’ then anima of course is left to pick up the irrational, emotional, and fantastic… much of what psychology has been calling ego is the animus-half of the syzygy.

Hillman argues that the classical Latin distinction between anima and animus encodes the very opposition between irrational soul and rational consciousness, and that analytical psychology’s ‘ego’ is structurally coextensive with the animus pole of the syzygy.

Hillman, James, Anima: An Anatomy of a Personified Notion, 1985thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Animus was originally some ‘breath’ in the chest; also animus was the stuff of consciousness, and the consciousness was in the chest; therefore animus was breath that was consciousness in the chest.

Onians provides the philological and anatomical grounding for animus, locating its original sense as the conscious, breathing life-force resident in the chest and identified with the lungs as organs of awareness.

Onians, R B, The origins of European thought about the body, the mind,, 1988thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The Platonism of imaginal psychology is the mirror image of an idea of soul that is anima alba, pure, unbroken, only ‘anima’ (i. e., untouched by the ‘animus’).

Giegerich diagnoses Hillman’s imaginal psychology as a one-sided anima-consciousness that excludes the animus’s critical and logical function, leaving it incapable of adequate response to the conditions of modernity.

Giegerich, Wolfgang, The Soul’s Logical Life Towards a Rigorous Notion of, 2020thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Animus and Anima. Two Essays by Emma Jung.

Emma Jung’s collected essays constitute the foundational Jungian-tradition text dedicated exclusively to the phenomenology and differentiation of the animus and anima as distinct contrasexual archetypes.

Jung, Emma, Animus and Anima, 1957supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

animus, 38, 268f; as Chinese hun soul, 38; figure, 269; inferior Logos, 41; opinions, 41; possession, 267

Jung’s index entries crystallize the core attributes assigned to animus in the Collected Works: its identification with the inferior Logos, its cross-cultural analogue in the Chinese hun soul, and its pathological mode as possession by opinions.

Jung, C. G., Collected Works Volume 3: The Psychogenesis of Mental Disease, 1907supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Because we take the anima personalistically, or she dupes the ego this way, we lose the wider significance of anima… unless we understand the ‘within’ in a radically new way — or classically old way — we go on perpetuating the division between my anima and world soul.

Hillman argues that restricting anima to a personal interior function — the dominant Jungian reading — forecloses her cosmological dimension as the animating principle immanent in all things.

Hillman, James, Anima: An Anatomy of a Personified Notion, 1985supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Mercurius and anima have similarly shifty, flighty, iridescent, hard-to-catch, hard-to-fathom natures… the special significance of anima is psychic, since Mercurius is the representation par excellence of psychic nature.

By demonstrating the functional identity of anima with Mercurius, Hillman grounds her defining characteristic not in gender but in the mercurial, elusive quality of psychic nature itself.

Hillman, James, Anima: An Anatomy of a Personified Notion, 1985supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

She teaches personifying, and the very first lesson of her teaching is the reality of her independent personality over and against the habitual modes of experiencing with which we are so identified that they are called ego, I.

Hillman presents the anima as the pedagogical principle that initiates the ego into the recognition of autonomous psychic figures, thereby dissolving the ego’s claim to be the sole locus of experience.

Hillman, James, Re-Visioning Psychology, 1975supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

She generally makes the same cut with the animus. For example, in the case of that prostitute, her idea was that if she tried to earn her living by typing in an office… her animus said that that would go on forever, which was animus-opinion number one.

Von Franz illustrates the animus’s characteristic mode of compulsive, inflexible opinion-formation as it operates to rationalize a woman’s avoidance of reality, exemplifying the negative animus in clinical context.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Puer Aeternus: A Psychological Study of the Adult Struggle with the Paradise of Childhood, 1970supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Anima means soul and should designate something very wonderful and immortal… The German word Seele is closely related, via the Gothic form saiwald, to the Greek word aiolos, which means ‘quick-moving,’ ‘changeful of hue,’ ‘twinkling,’ something like a butterfly.

Jung, quoted by Hillman, etymologically locates anima within the semantic field of quicksilver changefulness and butterfly-like fleetingness, establishing her essential character as mobile, elusive psychic life.

Hillman, James, Anima: An Anatomy of a Personified Notion, 1985supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Anima consciousness clings to unconsciousness, as the nymphs adhere to their dense wooden trees and the echoes cannot leave their caves. It is an attached consciousness that sits like a small bird with a small voice upon the back of materia prima.

Hillman characterizes anima-consciousness as inherently attached to and embedded in the unconscious substrate, distinguishing it fundamentally from the separative, distancing character of animus-directed awareness.

Hillman, James, Anima: An Anatomy of a Personified Notion, 1985supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

E. Jung, Animus and Anima, trans. C. F. Baynes and H. Nagel (Spring Publications, 1957)… M.-L. von Franz, The Problem of the Feminine in Fairy Tales (Spring Publications, 1972).

Hillman’s bibliographic apparatus maps the primary Jungian-tradition scholarship on anima and animus, indicating the canonical texts through which these concepts were elaborated after Jung.

Hillman, James, Anima: An Anatomy of a Personified Notion, 1985aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms