Within the depth-psychology corpus, the Angel does not function as a simple theological datum but as a charged psychological symbol occupying the threshold between the human and the numinous. The range of treatments is wide and revealing. Henry Corbin, the most philosophically rigorous voice on this figure, reads the Angel through Sufi metaphysics as the essential theophanic correlate of each spiritual individual — the divine Name invested in a person, the form through which God both reveals Himself and is known. This is the Angel as ontological mirror, as celestial Alter Ego, and his readings of Ibn ‘Arabi make the concept indispensable to depth psychology’s engagement with imaginal epistemology. Rilke’s Duino Angels, analysed by Murray Stein, present a complementary terror: beings of absolute self-possession who transcend the living/dead dichotomy and strike fear even as they beckon. Von Franz, working clinically, records a dream-pronouncement that ‘the unconscious clothes itself in the form of an angel,’ anchoring the figure firmly within analytic psychology as a personification of the Self. Nichols and Jodorowsky, reading the Tarot Arcanum of Temperance, treat the Angel as an alchemical operator who mediates opposites — conscious and unconscious, spirit and matter. Edinger connects the seven angels of the Apocalypse to archetypal luminosities, while McNiff deploys the angel as a phenomenological metaphor for the autonomous life of images. The term thus moves between ontological guide, unconscious messenger, alchemical mediator, and imaginal presence.