samuels
The Seba library treats Andrew Samuels in 6 passages, across 3 authors (including Samuels, Andrew, Papadopoulos, Renos K., Russell, Dick).
Andrew Samuels is a Professional Member of the Society of Analytical Psychology, London… the editor of The Father: Contemporary Jungian Perspectives and the co-author of A Critical Dictionary of Jungian Analysis.
This passage establishes Samuels’s institutional identity and authorial corpus, anchoring his role as the principal synthesizer and critical historian of post-Jungian analytical psychology.
, Jung and the Post-Jungians, 1985thesis
the post-Jungian Andrew Samuels (Samuels 1995, 2001) also uses Jungian perspectives to discuss the way in which our political behaviour… may be understood better… by paying attention to the psychology of the unconscious.
Papadopoulos positions Samuels as the primary Jungian voice extending depth psychology into critical social and political theory, analogous to the Frankfurt School’s deployment of Freud.
, The Handbook of Jungian Psychology: Theory, Practice and Applications, 2006thesis
scintillae and luminosities of psyche …competes for importance with those contents themselves’ (Samuels 1989: 13). Samuels can only be thinking of the self-as-archetype among other archetypes here.
This passage engages directly with Samuels’s pluralist thesis that the self is one archetype among many, subjecting it to critical scrutiny while acknowledging its influence on debates about self and identity.
, The Handbook of Jungian Psychology: Theory, Practice and Applications, 2006thesis
they began discussing an article which in time became the influential book, Jung and the Post Jungians, by a Jung Jungian analyst in London, Andrew Samuels. The article accorded Hillman and Archetypal Psychology
Russell documents the reception of Samuels’s taxonomic project within Hillman’s Archetypal circle, indicating its reach and the politicized stakes of school classification within post-Jungian discourse.
, Life and Ideas of James Hillman, 2023supporting
Henderson reminds us that it is pointless to expect something to do more than it is designed to do or to criticise something for not being what it was never intended to be.
Samuels uses Henderson’s appraisal of the Developmental School to model the school-comparative method that defines his own analytical approach throughout Jung and the Post-Jungians.
, Jung and the Post-Jungians, 1985supporting
Samuels, A. (1980a), ‘Incest and omnipotence in the internal family’, J. Analyt. Psychol., 25:1, pp. 37–58.
The bibliography catalogues Samuels’s pre-1985 scholarly output, revealing the range of clinical and theoretical topics—family psychology, training, diagnosis—that informed his broader synthetic project.
, Jung and the Post-Jungians, 1985supporting