Alone With The Alone

The phrase ‘Alone With The Alone’ carries a genealogy that moves between Sufi mysticism, Neoplatonism, and depth psychology. Henry Corbin’s 1969 study of Ibn ‘Arabi fixed the phrase as a technical designation for the soul’s encounter with its celestial counterpart — the Angel as individuating principle — wherein the mystic’s solitude is not isolation but a peculiarly populated interiority. Corbin’s formulation draws directly on Plotinus’s ‘flight of the alone to the Alone,’ and in his hands it becomes the master metaphor for a theophany that is simultaneously angelophany and self-knowledge. The depth-psychological corpus receives this inheritance diversely. Winnicott, working from an entirely different axis, theorizes ‘the capacity to be alone in the presence of someone’ as the developmental matrix for genuine selfhood — a secular, object-relational translation of the same paradox. Hillman extends the problem archetypal-ly, arguing that an irreducible loneliness accompanies the daimon from birth and cannot be dissolved by therapeutic or social means. Yalom frames existential isolation as the irreducible gap between selves — a condition that authentic relation may temper but never abolish. The field thus holds in tension a mystical reading (solitude as theophanic encounter), a developmental reading (solitude as ego-formation), and an existential reading (solitude as ontological given). The stakes concern nothing less than whether the self encounters itself, its God, or its void when it stands most nakedly alone.

In the library 15 passages

This is the very relationship we outlined above in the idea of the Angel compounded with the idea that every theophany necessarily has the form of an angelophany… The ‘Self’ is a characteristic term by which a mystic spirituality underlines its dissociation from all the aims and implications of denominational dogmatisms.

Corbin’s central argument equates the soul’s solitary self-knowledge with a theophanic encounter that is inseparably angelophanic, linking Ibn ‘Arabi’s ‘alone with the Alone’ to Emerson’s Self-Reliance as parallel structures of esoteric inwardness.

Corbin, Henry, Alone with the Alone: Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn Arabi, 1969thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It is only when alone (that is to say, in the presence of someone) that the infant can discover his own personal life. The pathological alternative is a false life built on reactions to external stimuli.

Winnicott’s paradoxical formulation — that genuine aloneness requires a supportive other — provides the object-relational counterpart to the mystical ‘alone with the Alone,’ grounding the concept in developmental ego-formation.

Winnicott, Donald, The Capacity to Be Alone, 1958thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It is only when alone (that is to say, in the presence of someone) that the infant can discover his own personal life. The pathological alternative is a false life built on reactions to external stimuli.

Winnicott restates his core thesis that authentic personal life — the capacity to be genuinely alone — emerges only within a matrix of ego-relatedness, not in literal isolation.

Winnicott, Donald, The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, 1965thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

an individual’s capacity to be alone depends on his ability to deal with the feelings aroused by the primal scene… it implies fusion of the aggressive and erotic impulses and ideas, and it implies a tolerance of ambivalence

Winnicott extends the developmental account of aloneness into the triangular dynamics of the primal scene, arguing that mature solitude requires an integration of ambivalence and erotic maturity.

Winnicott, Donald, The Capacity to Be Alone, 1958supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

if there is an archetypal sense of loneliness accompanying us from the beginning, then to be alive is also to feel lonely… When feelings of loneliness are seen as archetypal, they become necessary; they are no longer harbingers of sin, of dread, or of wrong.

Hillman reframes the loneliness implicit in ‘alone with the Alone’ as an archetypal necessity inseparable from the daimonic calling, freeing it from pathological or moral interpretation.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

its source, however, seems to be the solitary uniqueness of each daimon, an archetypal loneliness inexpressible in a child’s vocabulary and formulated hardly better in ours.

Hillman locates the origin of existential aloneness in the daimon’s irreducible singularity, connecting the soul’s isolation to its unique calling rather than to biographical wound.

Hillman, James, The Soul’s Code: In Search of Character and Calling, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Experiences where one is alone, and everyday guidelines are suddenly stripped away, have the power to evoke a sense of the uncanny — of not being at home in the world… a lonely dread that is a wind blowing from one’s own desert place — the nothing that is at the core of being.

Yalom describes existential isolation as the uncanny disclosure of groundlessness at the core of being, offering a secular phenomenological parallel to the mystical encounter with void or pleroma.

Yalom, Irvin D., Existential Psychotherapy, 1980supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Today’s secular Everyman who cannot or does not embrace religious faith must indeed take the journey alone.

Yalom reads the medieval morality play Everyman as evidence that existential isolation is the irreducible human condition once religious consolation is withdrawn, paralleling the mystic’s unmediated solitude.

Yalom, Irvin D., Existential Psychotherapy, 1980supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

loneliness, far from being a rare and curious phenomenon… is the central and inevitable fact of human existence…. All this hideous doubt, despair, and dark confusion of the soul a lonely man must know, for he is united to no image save that which he creates himself.

Drawing on Thomas Wolfe, Hollis argues that loneliness is the irreducible ground of selfhood, a view that resonates with Corbin’s mystical formulation of the self constituted only in solitary encounter.

Hollis, James, Swamplands of the Soul: New Life in Dismal Places, 1996supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

after satisfactory intercourse each partner is alone and is contented to be alone. Being able to enjoy being alone along with another person who is also alone is in itself an experience of health.

Winnicott illustrates that genuine aloneness-in-presence is the mark of psychological health, the relational condition that enables rather than forecloses authentic solitude.

Winnicott, Donald, The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, 1965supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The true leap or growth of a person occurs when he is utterly alone. It is in human relationships or in the actual world that he makes sure of his own leap or growth. But it is not in the actual human rela

Brazier, drawing on Tomoda’s Buddhist therapeutic perspective, argues that genuine personal growth is achieved in radical solitude, even if subsequently verified in relationship — a position structurally homologous to Corbin’s mystical claim.

Brazier, David, Zen Therapy: Transcending the Sorrows of the Human Mind, 1995supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Being an individual is thus related to the experience of being an only child, an experience which has two major aspects; one positive and one negative… The negative aspect of being an only child is that it means being lonely.

Edinger connects the Gnostic image of the only-begotten One to the psychological experience of individuation’s inherent loneliness, placing aloneness at the structural heart of ego-Self differentiation.

Edinger, Edward F., Ego and Archetype: Individuation and the Religious Function of the Psyche, 1972supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Perhaps the Old Wise Man has come back to teach us the forgotten art of solitude. Today, the notion

Nichols reads the Hermit Tarot figure as an archetypal teacher of solitude, gesturing toward the same valorisation of disciplined aloneness that Corbin locates in mystical tradition.

Nichols, Sallie, Jung and Tarot: An Archetypal Journey, 1980aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

For the man who is solitary, as it is conceived, is considered to be a helpless person and exposed to those who wish to harm him… it is not the sight of a human creature which removes us from solitude, but the sight of one who is faithful and modest and helpful to us.

Epictetus distinguishes mere physical isolation from genuine solitude determined by the quality of inner or outer companionship, an antique precedent for the paradox of ‘alone with the Alone.’

Epictetus, Discourses, 108aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms