The term agon — contest, struggle, assembly — occupies a richly layered position in the depth-psychology corpus, operating simultaneously as a structural category of ritual, a cultural-psychological force, and a dramatic-literary form. Jane Ellen Harrison establishes the most systematic treatment: in her morphology of Greek tragedy and eniautos ritual, agon designates the primal first movement of the Year-Daimon cycle — the contest between the Old Year and the New, light against darkness, summer against winter — that initiates the sequence of Pathos, Threnos, Anagnorisis, and Epiphany. Harrison’s analysis situates agon not as mere competition but as the generative tension from which death and renewal proceed. Walter Burkert extends this into the sociological and cultic register: the agonal spirit, theorized first by Nietzsche, pervades Greek religion’s institutional life, linking athletic procession, initiation, and sacrifice into a unified structure of sanctioned violence and communal regeneration. Jean-Pierre Vernant reads agon as the organizing principle of the Greek political imagination — the agora itself constituted as an oratorical contest among equals — thereby bridging the ritual and civic dimensions. Across these positions, the key tension is whether agon is primarily a ritual-cosmological form (Harrison, Burkert) or a socio-political one (Vernant), with both registers converging on its function as the structured encounter with alterity that produces transformation.