Across the depth-psychology corpus, affect-laden memory occupies a contested and generative position at the intersection of neuroscience, attachment theory, and clinical trauma work. The term designates memories whose encoding, retention, and retrieval are decisively shaped by emotional intensity — memories that carry forward the affective signature of the original experience, often independently of conscious narrative. Schore’s neurobiological account locates these formations in early dyadic exchanges, where ‘nuclear scenes’ crystallize as affectively charged episodic memories that organize lifelong relational templates. Siegel charts an inverted-U relationship between emotional intensity and mnemonic consolidation, noting that overwhelming affect may paradoxically impair explicit hippocampal encoding. Van der Kolk, Ogden, and Levine converge on the somatic dimension: affect-laden traumatic memories resist verbal integration and persist as procedural, sensorimotor, and autonomic residues. Lanius and colleagues document the neural correlates — amygdala hyperactivation, hippocampal atrophy, and fragmented autobiographical retrieval — that distinguish trauma-memory from ordinary recollection. The central clinical tension across these authors is whether affect-laden memories demand direct re-experiencing for resolution or whether titrated somatic and relational approaches can metabolize the affective charge without retraumatization. Shapiro’s EMDR model and Brewin’s dual-representation theory offer intermediate positions, emphasizing the adaptive assimilation of emotionally valenced material into verbally accessible memory systems.