Adolescence occupies a richly contested position within the depth-psychological corpus, understood not merely as a biographical phase but as an archetypal condition with its own ontological weight. Winnicott, whose contributions here are most sustained, insists that adolescence must be distinguished from the adolescent: society perpetually carries the adolescent state, even as individual young persons pass through and beyond it. For Winnicott, the unconscious fantasy structuring this phase is irreducibly one of displacement and death — growth toward identity is accomplished, symbolically, over the body of an adult. Stein situates adolescence as the first of the great metamorphic thresholds in the life-cycle, homologous in structure with the midlife transformation, producing a new psychosocial identity whose persona conceals a still-latent true self. Hillman reads the puer aeternus as the archetypal image of adolescence, linking the phase to timeless mythological patterns of inflation, idealism, and resistance to senex containment. Greene, working from astrological developmental psychology, maps adolescence onto specific house placements and transits, emphasizing the identity-search as its governing concern. James and Neumann each note its convergence with religious and consciousness-developmental dynamics. A recurring tension runs through all accounts: the genuine creative immaturity of adolescence — its idealism, rebellion, and refusal of false solutions — versus the developmental necessity of its supersession.