The concept of addictive identity occupies a contested yet generative space within the depth-psychology corpus, designating the condition in which the self becomes organized around — and ultimately colonized by — its addictive object or behavior. Authors approach this configuration from divergent angles. Stephanie Brown articulates it most clinically: the belief in control over one’s substance use becomes the organizing principle of the entire personality, demanding ever more elaborate self-deception and producing a self whose coherence is fundamentally false. Bruce Alexander situates addictive identity within a sociological frame, tracing it to Eriksonian ‘negative identity’ — the self that coalesces around marginality and dislocation when positive psychosocial integration fails. Addenbrooke’s narrators illuminate the phenomenology from within: the ‘addict’ self progressively overwhelms once-valued aspects of personality, reducing the will and collapsing the ego’s cohesive function. Christina Grof, writing from a transpersonal register, argues that spiritual identity persists beneath the addictive self as an occluded but indestructible ground. David Schoen reads the addictive identity through Jungian analytical categories, particularly the Addiction-Shadow-Complex, which seizes ego-function and supplants authentic selfhood. Across these positions, the key tension is whether addictive identity represents a failure of development, a response to dislocation, an archetypal possession, or a distorted spiritual seeking — a tension that remains productively unresolved in the literature.