Within the depth-psychology corpus and its adjacent classical and hermeneutical traditions, ‘Accumulation’ operates on at least three distinct registers that the concordance must hold in productive tension. In the I Ching commentarial lineage — represented here by Wilhelm, Huang, and the Taoist readings of Liu I-ming and Cleary — accumulation names an active cosmological and ethical process: the slow, disciplined gathering of virtue, strength, or celestial energy prior to the moment of rightful action. The hexagrams Da Xü (Great Accumulation) and Xiao Xü (Little Accumulation) articulate a psychology of restraint-as-preparation, where the inability to act is not defeat but the very condition of eventual power. This stands in revealing contrast to the Homeric-Jungian material assembled by Cody Peterson, where accumulation names the distinctive burden of mortal interiority: the thūmos as a vessel that collects ‘residue’ from experience, generating the capacity for value-creation that the gods — because they cannot paschō — permanently lack. A third, sociological register appears in von Franz’s distinction between crowd, group, and mass, where a crowd is defined precisely as ‘random accumulation.’ Taken together, these positions suggest that accumulation is never neutral in depth-psychological discourse: it implies a container, a purpose, and a time of release.