Absence occupies a remarkably heterogeneous position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as ontological condition, psychic wound, spiritual trial, and structural necessity. Marion Woodman locates absence at the etiological core of addiction: addicted persons live within an ‘absence of reality,’ their ground of trust having been destroyed, leaving simulation as the only recourse. James Hillman confronts absence theologically, questioning whether the apparent flight of the gods is genuine withdrawal or a modern misreading of immanence — and pressing the more radical question of whether divine beings can absent themselves at all. Wolfgang Giegerich theorizes a distinctively modern ‘absenteeism’ in which homo absconditus has subtracted himself from meaningful engagement with truth, contrasting presence with the fullness that absence eclipses. Jacques Derrida treats the absence of the addressee as constitutive of writing itself, arguing that a radical, non-empirical absence is the structural condition enabling textual signification. In religious psychology, Glaz documents the paradox that the experience of God’s absence positively correlates with deepened trust, self-understanding, and openness to encounter — a finding that resonates with the apophatic and ascetic traditions. Turner’s liminality schema encodes absence of property, rank, and status as the anthropological substrate of transformation. Damasio approaches absence from neuroscience, studying consciousness through the phenomenology of its own disappearance. These divergent positions share a common recognition: absence is not mere negation but a generative, structuring force.