The abdomen occupies a surprisingly rich and contested position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as anatomical site, symbolic vessel, and interoceptive ground. Classical sources — Plato’s Timaeus foremost among them — situate the appetitive soul between the midriff and navel, binding desire ‘like a wild animal’ away from the rational counsel-chamber of the chest. This tripartite somatic theology reverberates through Onians’s philological excavations of the Hebrew beten and me’im, where the belly is the literal source of seed and inheritance, and through Vernant’s structuralist reading of the omphalos as the root of the abdomen signifying maternal origin and civic belonging. Rank extends the symbolic register further, equating the earth’s interior with the female abdomen as the primordial centre of chthonian creation. In the clinical tradition, Janet documents hysterical meteorism and diaphragmatic paralysis as abdominal somatic conversions, while Bleuler records hallucinatory violations of the lower abdomen as transparently sexualized projections in schizophrenic patients. Contemporary somatic and trauma-oriented practitioners — Ogden, Levine, Price, Damasio, and Fogel — reclaim the abdomen as the privileged theatre of interoceptive awareness, visceral regulation, and felt-sense processing, drawing on polyvagal and enteric-nervous-system science to ground what ancient cosmologies had already intuited: that the belly thinks, feels, and remembers.